<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.enziosclock.com">
<channel>
 <title>Enzio&#039;s Clock - Global: Who needs Enzio&#039;s Economic  Clock? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.enziosclock.com/money/thoughts/2007/12/06</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Global: Who needs Enzio&#039;s Economic  Clock?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Global: Who needs Enzio&#039;s Economic  Clock?</title>
 <link>http://www.enziosclock.com/money/thoughts/2007/12/06</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-body flexinode-12&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;flexinode-textarea-67&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Introduction:&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;We have little value to add at this stage of market  jumpiness.  &lt;a href=&quot;/economic/time/united_states/2006/05/08&quot;&gt;Subscribers know what The Economic Clock™ is presaging particularly about America&lt;/a&gt;, and they also know about our views concerning &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/money/thoughts/2007/11/16&quot;&gt;de-coupling&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; as well as what is &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/economic/update/2007/10/18&quot;&gt;different&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; this time. Crucially, they also have been told &lt;a href=&quot;/economic/update/2007/12/04&quot;&gt;how to save&lt;/a&gt; - or indeed &lt;a href=&quot;/market/time/2007/11/29_0&quot;&gt;make money off our advice&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So we want to step back and re -address this issue of who in the first place even  &amp;quot;should&amp;quot; be interested in The Economic Time™  as an investment compass - and who should not. We cannot be all things to all people, and certainly are keeping value judgments out of this. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I used to be the Chief Asia economist for what is today Merrill Lynch and UBS, and what has remained ABN AMRO. Fine houses, great people to work with. So what I observe below has no hidden agenda. The point is simple: analysts increasingly have to watch their pens and avoid any form of &amp;quot;sell&amp;quot; recommendation - if they want to keep their jobs, that is. This often tainted advice is not good for institutions, but at least they can read between the lines of analysts&amp;#39; recommendations. However, the retail investor, the one whom we are addressing, often cannot read the pea soup of an analyst&amp;#39;s somewhat tainted recommendations. We are not insinuating that all analysts&amp;#39; recommendations are tainted; we are asserting that they often have to be just in order to keep the corporate on side for other business.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:06:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
